Social Mood Conference  |  Socionomics Foundation

 

By Alan Hall | Excerpted from the October 2011 Socionomist

Originally published in title “Democracy Under Attack”


 

[Ed: In the West, few institutions are as revered as democracy. Yet socionomics holds that social mood pushes around even society’s most sacred norms. In this pivotal 2011 article, socionomist Alan Hall reveals that democracy itself is now coming under attack. Where will politics end up after a historic bear market? As Hall shows with his breakthrough “Socionomic Nolan Chart,” the only certainty is an increasingly fragmented process.]

The Socionomic Nolan Chart Helps Us Map Current Events
Expressions of the large-degree negative social mood trend now seem to be accelerating and putting aspects of our Socionomic Nolan Chart (Figure 1) into motion. (For a review of the thinking behind the chart, click here). So forceful is the mood shift that even democracy itself, an idealized form of government during the Grand Supercycle uptrend from 1784, is now coming under more-widespread attack from within democracies. It is still early in this process. One should not assume that democracy, or at least its current form, will survive the expected Grand Supercycle downtrend in social mood.

Nolan Chart

Figure 1

You Are Here: Western society’s ideological decentralization process appears to be somewhere between stages 2 and 3.

In the United States, Peter Orzsag, the former director of President Obama’s Office of Management and Budget, wrote an article, “Too Much of a Good Thing: Why We Need Less Democracy.” Orszag said U.S. “political polarization was growing worse – harming Washington’s ability to do the basic, necessary work of governing.” Beverly Purdue, the governor of North Carolina, called for suspending elections for two years so that Congress can “get over the partisan bickering and focus on fixing things.”1

Citizens, too, are increasingly questioning whether representational democracy works. “‘Voting is worthless’? Global protests share contempt for democracy,” reads a September 28, MSNBC headline. The article cites a common theme in the recent street demonstrations, boycotts and strikes in New York, London, Spain, Greece, India and Israel: “wariness, even contempt, toward traditional politicians and the democratic political process they preside over.”4

“We’re the first generation to say that voting is worthless,” said a young Spanish woman. A young Indian woman said, “We elect the people’s representatives so they can solve our problems, [but] that is not actually happening. Corruption is ruling our country.” A young Israeli man said, “The political system has abandoned its citizens.”

******************************************************************************

Read the rest of this four-page article to learn what the 2009 Tea Party protests and the 2011 Occupy Wall Street movements have in common. Discover what is happening to the number of liberal democracies worldwide, and why Hall claims internal fragmentation will become the “new normal” of society.

Want more content like this?

The Socionomist is the only monthly publication that offers you practical insights on the relationship between social mood, financial markets and cultural trends. Each issue warns you about big societal changes before they can harm you and reveals breakthrough opportunities emerging from trends in society.

Learn more about The Socionomist now.

(Socionomics Members: Log in for the full article and your complete, exclusive archive.)


Socionomics InstituteThe Socionomist is a monthly online magazine designed to help readers see and capitalize on the waves of social mood that contantly occur throughout the world. It is published by the Socionomics Institute, Robert R. Prechter, president; Matt Lampert, editor-in-chief; Alyssa Hayden, editor; Alan Hall and Chuck Thompson, staff writers; Dave Allman and Pete Kendall, editorial direction; Chuck Thompson, production; Ben Hall, proofreader.

For subscription matters, contact Customer Care: Call 770-536-0309 (internationally) or 800-336-1618 (within the U.S.). Or email customercare@socionomics.net.

We are always interested in guest submissions. Please email manuscripts and proposals to Chuck Thompson via institute@socionomics.net. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, Georgia, 30503, U.S.A. Phone 770-536-0309. Please consult the submission guidelines located at http://www.socionomics.net/PDF/Socionomist_Submission_Guidelines.pdf.

For our latest offerings: Visit our website, www.socionomics.net, listing BOOKS, DVDs and more.

Correspondence is welcome, but volume of mail often precludes a reply. Whether it is a general inquiry, socionomics commentary or a research idea, you can email us at institute@socionomics.net.

Most economists, historians and sociologists presume that events determine society’s mood. But socionomics hypothesizes the opposite: that social mood regulates the character of social events. The events of history—such as investment booms and busts, political events, macroeconomic trends and even peace and war—are the products of a naturally occurring pattern of social-mood fluctuation. Such events, therefore, are not randomly distributed, as is commonly believed, but are in fact probabilistically predictable. Socionomics also posits that the stock market is the best available meter of a society’s aggregate mood, that news is irrelevant to social mood, and that financial and economic decision-making are fundamentally different in that financial decisions are motivated by the herding impulse while economic choices are guided by supply and demand. For more information about socionomic theory, see (1) the text, The Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior © 1999, by Robert Prechter; (2) the introductory documentary History's Hidden Engine; (3) the video Toward a New Science of Social Prediction, Prechter’s 2004 speech before the London School of Economics in which he presents evidence to support his socionomic hypothesis; and (4) the Socionomics Institute’s website, www.socionomics.net. At no time will the Socionomics Institute make specific recommendations about a course of action for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended.

All contents copyright © 2019 Socionomics Institute. All rights reserved. Feel free to quote, cite or review, giving full credit. Typos and other such errors may be corrected after initial posting.


Tags