|By Alan Hall | Excerpted from the March 2011 Socionomist
Originally published in the title “Authoritarianism: Conflict Intensifies”
Suddenly it seems that protests and rebellions have become the new normal around the globe, as Alan Hall predicted would happen in his April / May 2010 study on authoritarianism / anti-authoritarianism.
In this update, socionomist Alan Hall examines recent anti-authoritarian protests in North Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Europe, North America and South America—all of which, he submits, have been spurred by declining social mood at a large degree. Excerpts follow.
Since our last issue, thousands of Greek citizens have taken on authorities in a nationwide strike to oppose their government’s deep budget cuts. They hit police with rocks and gasoline bombs, and police responded with tear gas and flash grenades. We noted last year that the extreme optimism of the Grand Supercycle peak in social mood had generated unsustainable government spending in many countries, including Greece. As a result, many people have become more dependent on and thereby more vulnerable to the decisions of their governments. The social stresses are now impelling both authoritarian policies and opposition to them.
Meanwhile in the United Kingdom, an estimated 250,000 to 500,000 citizens marched in London on March 26 to protest government budget cuts. And in Bolivia, demonstrators in multiple cities demanded the resignation of government officials who, the unhappy citizens said, had done too little to address inflation in food and transportation prices. In Asia, the South Korean newspaper The Chosun Ilbo reported that protests in tightly controlled North Korea took place in February; in a follow-up report on March 25, the publication said that the North Korean regime had warned its people not to keep the South Korean propaganda leaflets being dropped over the country. The newspaper said North Korean authorities fear a democratic uprising like those currently occurring in the Middle East. In China, officials blocked the Twitter and Facebook websites after activists attempted to organize protests via social media. Authorities also blocked LinkedIn after a user called for revolution. In the Middle East, Bahrain’s government used force to bring an end to a month-long protest. Some 100 people died in a government crackdown on protests in Syria. And in Yemen, supporters of President Ali Abdullah Saleh fired on peaceful demonstrators. In the U.S., workers’ unions spent weeks protesting a law proposed by Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker that curtailed collective bargaining for public employees. Walker was victorious, but on March 18, Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi issued a temporary restraining order halting the new law. Finally, in Libya, air attacks by the U.S. and its allies reduced the ability of that nation’s dictator, Colonel Muammar Quaddafi, to oppose a rebel advance. At press time, rebels were fighting Quaddafi’s forces for control of the oil town of Brega. …
In the remainder of this packed, two-page report, Alan Hall discusses multiple other growing expressions of authoritarianism–such as the use of surveillance cameras and proposals for increased control of the Internet. All are on the rise during the current large-scale social mood decline.
Want more content like this?
The Socionomist is the only monthly publication that offers you practical insights on the relationship between social mood, financial markets and cultural trends. Each issue warns you about big societal changes before they can harm you and reveals breakthrough opportunities emerging from trends in society.
(Socionomics Members: Log in for the full article and your complete, exclusive archive.)
Socionomist is a monthly online magazine designed to help
readers see and capitalize on the waves of social mood that contantly occur
throughout the world. It is published by the Socionomics
Institute, Robert R. Prechter, president; Matt Lampert, editor-in-chief;
Alyssa Hayden, editor; Alan Hall and Chuck Thompson, staff writers; Dave Allman
and Pete Kendall, editorial direction; Chuck Thompson, production; Ben Hall,
For subscription matters, contact Customer Care: Call 770-536-0309 (internationally) or 800-336-1618 (within the U.S.). Or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
We are always interested in guest submissions. Please email manuscripts and proposals to Chuck Thompson via email@example.com. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, Georgia, 30503, U.S.A. Phone 770-536-0309. Please consult the submission guidelines located at http://www.socionomics.net/PDF/Socionomist_Submission_Guidelines.pdf.
For our latest offerings: Visit our website, www.socionomics.net, listing BOOKS, DVDs and more.
Correspondence is welcome, but volume of mail often precludes a reply. Whether it is a general inquiry, socionomics commentary or a research idea, you can email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Most economists, historians and sociologists
presume that events determine society’s mood. But socionomics hypothesizes
the opposite: that social mood regulates the character of social events. The
events of history—such as investment booms and busts, political events,
macroeconomic trends and even peace and war—are the products of a naturally
occurring pattern of social-mood fluctuation. Such events, therefore, are not
randomly distributed, as is commonly believed, but are in fact probabilistically
predictable. Socionomics also posits that the stock market is the best available
meter of a society’s aggregate mood, that news is irrelevant to social
mood, and that financial and economic decision-making are fundamentally different
in that financial decisions are motivated by the herding impulse while economic
choices are guided by supply and demand. For more information about socionomic
theory, see (1) the text, The
Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior © 1999, by Robert Prechter;
(2) the introductory documentary History's
Hidden Engine; (3) the video Toward
a New Science of Social Prediction, Prechter’s 2004 speech before
the London School of Economics in which he presents evidence to support his
socionomic hypothesis; and (4) the Socionomics Institute’s website, www.socionomics.net.
At no time will the Socionomics Institute make specific recommendations about
a course of action for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller
or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended.
All contents copyright © 2019 Socionomics Institute. All rights reserved. Feel free to quote, cite or review, giving full credit. Typos and other such errors may be corrected after initial posting.