|Originally published in the January 2011 Socionomist|
Tallying the Mexican Drug War’s toll:
- 2010 was the cruelest period yet in the four-year-old civil battle: 15,000 dead from drug-related violence.
- The war has claimed an estimated 30,000 Mexican lives in four years.
- Residents are abandoning homes to escape the carnage. In November alone about 400 families fled Ciudad Mier in northeastern Mexico, where two drug gangs—the Gulf cartel and the Zetas—are violently clashing. Residents continue to leave Ciudad Juarez, where a fifth of the country’s casualties—more than 3,000 people—died in 2010. Juarez became a killing field in 2008 when the Sinaloa Cartel attempted to move in on the Juarez Cartel’s territory. As many as 230,000 Juarez residents, or 15 percent of the city’s population, are now Drug War refugees.
- The Drug War is exacting an economic toll as well. For example, about 6,000 Juarez businesses closed last year. Some moved across the border to El Paso, where many of Juarez’s remaining residents are making their purchases to the tune of an estimated $220 million a year.
What’s next? In his landmark article, “The Coming Collapse of a Modern Prohibition,” which appeared in the July 2009 issue of The Socionomist, the Institute’s Euan Wilson drew parallels between the current war on drugs and the prohibition of alcohol in the U.S. during the 1920s and early 1930s. Wilson predicted that the current war would see increasing clashes over supply routes; those conflicts are indeed unfolding in Juarez and Mier now. Next, Wilson said, he expected Mexico’s drug war to spill over to the southern United States, where regions of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas will experience “the same violence that is now plaguing Mexican states.” This process has already started too, as we’ve reported on numerous occasions.
Wilson says that if mood declines again as forecast by Elliott Wave International, the carnage on both sides of the border will continue and worsen. Eventually, he forecasts, the U.S. public will tire of the kidnapping and bloodshed that accompany the war and demand that marijuana, the criminals’ lead product, be decriminalized. Legalization will undercut the cartels’ profits, advocates will argue, and by extension, bleed away their power.■
Socionomist is a monthly online magazine designed to help
readers see and capitalize on the waves of social mood that contantly occur
throughout the world. It is published by the Socionomics
Institute, Robert R. Prechter, president; Matt Lampert, editor-in-chief;
Alyssa Hayden, editor; Alan Hall and Chuck Thompson, staff writers; Dave Allman
and Pete Kendall, editorial direction; Chuck Thompson, production; Ben Hall,
For subscription matters, contact Customer Care: Call 770-536-0309 (internationally) or 800-336-1618 (within the U.S.). Or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
We are always interested in guest submissions. Please email manuscripts and proposals to Chuck Thompson via email@example.com. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, Georgia, 30503, U.S.A. Phone 770-536-0309. Please consult the submission guidelines located at http://www.socionomics.net/PDF/Socionomist_Submission_Guidelines.pdf.
For our latest offerings: Visit our website, www.socionomics.net, listing BOOKS, DVDs and more.
Correspondence is welcome, but volume of mail often precludes a reply. Whether it is a general inquiry, socionomics commentary or a research idea, you can email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Most economists, historians and sociologists
presume that events determine society’s mood. But socionomics hypothesizes
the opposite: that social mood regulates the character of social events. The
events of history—such as investment booms and busts, political events,
macroeconomic trends and even peace and war—are the products of a naturally
occurring pattern of social-mood fluctuation. Such events, therefore, are not
randomly distributed, as is commonly believed, but are in fact probabilistically
predictable. Socionomics also posits that the stock market is the best available
meter of a society’s aggregate mood, that news is irrelevant to social
mood, and that financial and economic decision-making are fundamentally different
in that financial decisions are motivated by the herding impulse while economic
choices are guided by supply and demand. For more information about socionomic
theory, see (1) the text, The
Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior © 1999, by Robert Prechter;
(2) the introductory documentary History's
Hidden Engine; (3) the video Toward
a New Science of Social Prediction, Prechter’s 2004 speech before
the London School of Economics in which he presents evidence to support his
socionomic hypothesis; and (4) the Socionomics Institute’s website, www.socionomics.net.
At no time will the Socionomics Institute make specific recommendations about
a course of action for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller
or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended.
All contents copyright © 2019 Socionomics Institute. All rights reserved. Feel free to quote, cite or review, giving full credit. Typos and other such errors may be corrected after initial posting.