Social Mood Conference  |  Socionomics Foundation
By Mark Galasiewski | Excerpted from the December 2010 Socionomist

Originally published under the title “Mood in the Middle East: A Historical Perspective”


[Ed: Our studies show that the stock market is a kind of barometer of social mood and a leading indicator of a whole range of social trends. Inclusionist social developments, for example, tend to cluster in and follow periods of rising stock prices, and exclusionist events tend to erupt only once prices have declined significantly. In this article, Mark Galasiewski – editor of our publication Asian-Pacific Financial Forecast – illustrates this relationship using contemporary historical examples from the Middle East.]

The above chart shows major social events in the Middle East in conjunction with the S&P 500, the Tel Aviv 100 and the Amman General stock price indexes. These stock indexes reflect the social moods in the United States, Israel and the Arab world, respectively.

Inclusionist events are displayed above the price lines, and exclusionist events below them. As you can see, the events generally express the previously rising or falling trends in social mood for each society. Socionomics Institute founder Robert Prechter calls this the socionomic hypothesis.

For example, notice the timing of the start of the Gaza War, which erupted in late 2008 after declines of more than 50% in both the Israeli and the Jordanian indexes. Such behavior makes sense from the perspective of trends in social mood. When mood trends toward the negative, it shows up immediately in falling stock prices. Then, as fear and anger strain weak relationships, conflicts eventually erupt. The opposite dynamic is at work when the social mood is rising or near peaks. For example, just three years before the Gaza conflict, in the middle of the 2003-2007 rally in the Tel Aviv 100, Israel’s goodwill toward the Palestinians rose to such a high level that the government voluntarily decided to dismantle Jewish settlements in Gaza and to withdraw its forces from the territory.

When mood is positive in one society and negative in another, the results are also compatible with the socionomic hypothesis. For example, long periods of positive-trending social mood in both Israeli and Arab societies paved the way for the Oslo Accords in 1993. In July 2000, one month from the end of a five-and-a-half-year bull market in the Tel Aviv 100, the leaders of Israel and Palestine held a similar summit at Camp David in the United States. But, this time, the Arab index was near the end of a two-year bear market (the low end of an eight-year trading range), and the two sides walked away without shaking hands. …

******************************************************************************

In the remainder of this three-page article, Mark Galasiewski charts 13 major Israeli actions since 1948, as well as each of the post-2005 violent events listed on Wikipedia’s “Arab-Israeli Conflict” page. You’ll be amazed to see how closely social mood and these events align.

Want more content like this?

The Socionomist is the only monthly publication that offers you practical insights on the relationship between social mood, financial markets and cultural trends. Each issue warns you about big societal changes before they can harm you and reveals breakthrough opportunities emerging from trends in society.

Learn more about The Socionomist now.

(Socionomics Members: Log in for the full article and your complete, exclusive archive.)


Socionomics InstituteThe Socionomist is a monthly online magazine designed to help readers see and capitalize on the waves of social mood that contantly occur throughout the world. It is published by the Socionomics Institute, Robert R. Prechter, president; Matt Lampert, editor-in-chief; Alyssa Hayden, editor; Alan Hall and Chuck Thompson, staff writers; Dave Allman and Pete Kendall, editorial direction; Chuck Thompson, production; Ben Hall, proofreader.

For subscription matters, contact Customer Care: Call 770-536-0309 (internationally) or 800-336-1618 (within the U.S.). Or email customercare@socionomics.net.

We are always interested in guest submissions. Please email manuscripts and proposals to Chuck Thompson via institute@socionomics.net. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, Georgia, 30503, U.S.A. Phone 770-536-0309. Please consult the submission guidelines located at https://secureservercdn.net/184.168.47.225/3d8.988.myftpupload.com/PDF/Socionomist_Submission_Guidelines.pdf.

For our latest offerings: Visit our website, www.socionomics.net, listing BOOKS, DVDs and more.

Correspondence is welcome, but volume of mail often precludes a reply. Whether it is a general inquiry, socionomics commentary or a research idea, you can email us at institute@socionomics.net.

Most economists, historians and sociologists presume that events determine society’s mood. But socionomics hypothesizes the opposite: that social mood regulates the character of social events. The events of history—such as investment booms and busts, political events, macroeconomic trends and even peace and war—are the products of a naturally occurring pattern of social-mood fluctuation. Such events, therefore, are not randomly distributed, as is commonly believed, but are in fact probabilistically predictable. Socionomics also posits that the stock market is the best available meter of a society’s aggregate mood, that news is irrelevant to social mood, and that financial and economic decision-making are fundamentally different in that financial decisions are motivated by the herding impulse while economic choices are guided by supply and demand. For more information about socionomic theory, see (1) the text, The Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior © 1999, by Robert Prechter; (2) the introductory documentary History's Hidden Engine; (3) the video Toward a New Science of Social Prediction, Prechter’s 2004 speech before the London School of Economics in which he presents evidence to support his socionomic hypothesis; and (4) the Socionomics Institute’s website, www.socionomics.net. At no time will the Socionomics Institute make specific recommendations about a course of action for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended.

All contents copyright © 2019 Socionomics Institute. All rights reserved. Feel free to quote, cite or review, giving full credit. Typos and other such errors may be corrected after initial posting.


Tags