|By Alan Hall | Excerpted from the July 2010 Socionomist
Originally published under the title “Asset Bubbles Don’t Surprise Socionomists”
[Ed: Most people—including Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke and the lion’s share of economists—say it is impossible to predict asset bubbles. For example, an article in the Harvard Business Review (HBR), “Why Asset Bubbles Will Always Surprise Us,”1 states, “It would be nice if we could predict bubbles; even nicer if we could prevent them.”
[Socionomists can’t prevent bubbles. But in this astonishing report, socionomist Alan Hall reveals that we can predict them. And therefore we can help people get out of their way.]
Socionomics predicted the biggest asset bubble of all time a decade before it inflated, as the following quotes from The Elliott Wave Theorist demonstrate:
- November 1982: “Make no mistake about it. The next few years will be profitable beyond your wildest imagination. Make sure you make it while the making is good. Tune your mind to 1924.”2
- April 1983 Special Report: “In 1982 the DJIA finished a correction of very large degree. The evidence for this conclusion is overwhelming … . The advance following this correction will be a much bigger bull market than anything seen in the last two decades … . The 1920s’ bull market was a fifth wave of a third Supercycle wave, while Cycle wave V is the fifth wave of a fifth Supercycle wave. Thus, as the last hurrah, it should be characterized at its end by an almost unbelievable institutional mania for stocks and a public mania for stock index futures, stock options, and options on futures … . Investor mass psychology should reach manic proportions, with elements of 1929, 1968 and 1973 all operating together and, at the end, to an even greater extreme.”3
Socionomics both (1) recognized the asset bubble in its infancy and (2) described its maturity. As far as we know, it is the only financial, economic or sociological theory to have done so.
Figure 1 is an updated chart from “The Wave Principle Delineates Phases of Social Caution and Ebullience,” a study in the August 2009 issue of The Socionomist. It shows the utility of Elliott wave pattern analysis in predicting asset bubbles—down, even, to their breadth and amplitude. (Note that as this Grand Supercycle wave [III] advanced, each Cycle-degree fifth-wave asset mania was larger, lasted longer and involved more asset classes than the one before.)
In the remainder of this extraordinary three-page article, Hall discusses why social mood makes preventing asset bubbles impossible. Continue reading to understand how you can employ future asset bubbles to your advantage and avoid getting hurt by their aftermath.
Want more content like this?
The Socionomist is the only monthly publication that offers you practical insights on the relationship between social mood, financial markets and cultural trends. Each issue warns you about big societal changes before they can harm you and reveals breakthrough opportunities emerging from trends in society.
(Socionomics Members: Log in for the full article and your complete, exclusive archive.)
Socionomist is a monthly online magazine designed to help
readers see and capitalize on the waves of social mood that contantly occur
throughout the world. It is published by the Socionomics
Institute, Robert R. Prechter, president; Matt Lampert, editor-in-chief;
Alyssa Hayden, editor; Alan Hall and Chuck Thompson, staff writers; Dave Allman
and Pete Kendall, editorial direction; Chuck Thompson, production; Ben Hall,
For subscription matters, contact Customer Care: Call 770-536-0309 (internationally) or 800-336-1618 (within the U.S.). Or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
We are always interested in guest submissions. Please email manuscripts and proposals to Chuck Thompson via email@example.com. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, Georgia, 30503, U.S.A. Phone 770-536-0309. Please consult the submission guidelines located at http://www.socionomics.net/PDF/Socionomist_Submission_Guidelines.pdf.
For our latest offerings: Visit our website, www.socionomics.net, listing BOOKS, DVDs and more.
Correspondence is welcome, but volume of mail often precludes a reply. Whether it is a general inquiry, socionomics commentary or a research idea, you can email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Most economists, historians and sociologists
presume that events determine society’s mood. But socionomics hypothesizes
the opposite: that social mood regulates the character of social events. The
events of history—such as investment booms and busts, political events,
macroeconomic trends and even peace and war—are the products of a naturally
occurring pattern of social-mood fluctuation. Such events, therefore, are not
randomly distributed, as is commonly believed, but are in fact probabilistically
predictable. Socionomics also posits that the stock market is the best available
meter of a society’s aggregate mood, that news is irrelevant to social
mood, and that financial and economic decision-making are fundamentally different
in that financial decisions are motivated by the herding impulse while economic
choices are guided by supply and demand. For more information about socionomic
theory, see (1) the text, The
Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior © 1999, by Robert Prechter;
(2) the introductory documentary History's
Hidden Engine; (3) the video Toward
a New Science of Social Prediction, Prechter’s 2004 speech before
the London School of Economics in which he presents evidence to support his
socionomic hypothesis; and (4) the Socionomics Institute’s website, www.socionomics.net.
At no time will the Socionomics Institute make specific recommendations about
a course of action for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller
or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended.
All contents copyright © 2019 Socionomics Institute. All rights reserved. Feel free to quote, cite or review, giving full credit. Typos and other such errors may be corrected after initial posting.