|This essay by Peter Kendall originally appeared in The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast in June 2001. It was reprinted in:
Prechter, Robert R. (2003). Pioneering Studies in Socionomics. Gainesville, Georgia: New Classics Library, pp. 173-175 (Note: The book is also available for purchase as part of a two-volume set.)
Global conflict is a product of a downturn in social mood. The inescapable tensions between nations and distinct social groups that arise at such times is best illustrated by our long term chart of the Political Results of Social Sentiment (see page 173 of Pioneering Studies in Socionomics or the June, 2000 issue of The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast), which shows Hitler’s rise to power, World War II, the Holocaust and the dropping of two atomic bombs on Japan between the bear market lows of 1932, 1942 and 1949.
Social clashes take myriad forms, but one bellwether rift that has an almost perfect record of erupting into open hostility right at the onset of major downturns is in the Mideast. Figure 1 shows that relations between Jews and Arabs in Israel (or Palestine before 1948) have been particularly responsive to the onset of important bear markets since 1929. In that year, says The Year of the Great Crash, “All hell had broken loose in Palestine. At the end of August, a series of relatively inconsequential disputes concerning the privileges of worship for Jews and Muslims erupted into an orgy of bloodletting.” The violence came a few days before the Dows final high.
If major hostilities are defined as wars or mob violence that result in mass killings, each of the headlines on the graph marks a significant outbreak. All were preceded by periods of easing tension (or at least an absence of bloodshed) and followed by further clashes. The greatest stretch of peaceful cooperation between the two sides is shown in the Era of Good Feelings table at the bottom of Figure 1. It started on September 13, 1993 with the famous handshake between the Prime Minister of Israel and the Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization. Historians said the handshake was a symbol of a major breakthrough after a century of conflict. The Elliott Wave Theorist identified it as a product of the century-long advance in stock prices that would mark a long-term top rather than a great new era for Palestinian and Israeli relations. The next seven years of bull market yielded productive talks but no lasting peace. As late as January 30, 2000, the Houston Chronicle reported that the tide of history was moving the Mideast toward peace.
In reality, however, the tide had already reversed. In July 2000, the same paper would mark the moment by reporting, Syrian-Israeli peace negotiations have been frozen since mid-January. The exact date of the freeze was January 11, three days before the Dows all-time high. By last summer, the anxiety level was clearly rising fast as the Palestinians threatened to declare statehood and another peace conference failed to produce a breakthrough for the first time since 1993. As stocks entered their September-October swoon, Palestinian sections of Israel exploded in a continuous wave of rioting. In December, this headline evidenced the depth of anger: As Arafat Embraces Revolt, His Sagging Popularity Rises. Israel responded with the election of hardliner Ariel Sharon. In the first half of May 2001, the situation bordered on open warfare. Is It War Yet? asked one headline on May 20. On May 21, the Bush administration criticized Israel for using U.S. supplied warplanes against Palestinians for the first time since the 1967 war, which was a year after the peak of Cycle III . Finally, on May 22, the day of the Dows secondary high, there was a glimmer of hope as Sharon talked of compromise and ordered Israeli forces only to return fire if shot at.
Past signals have usually come at and after long term turns, although the 1967 outbreak was followed by a run that almost made a new high in 1968. Given that precedent, perhaps the unfolding crisis in the Mideast does not preclude a new high in the Dow. If the Dow goes to a new high, the conflict may ease briefly, but a historic sell signal for the stock market has clearly been issued by the open warfare. The Mideast s record as an early register of negative social mood suggests that a major bear market and thus the trend toward global hostility has only just begun.■
Socionomist is a monthly online magazine designed to help
readers see and capitalize on the waves of social mood that contantly occur
throughout the world. It is published by the Socionomics
Institute, Robert R. Prechter, president; Matt Lampert, editor-in-chief;
Alyssa Hayden, editor; Alan Hall and Chuck Thompson, staff writers; Dave Allman
and Pete Kendall, editorial direction; Chuck Thompson, production; Ben Hall,
For subscription matters, contact Customer Care: Call 770-536-0309 (internationally) or 800-336-1618 (within the U.S.). Or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
We are always interested in guest submissions. Please email manuscripts and proposals to Chuck Thompson via email@example.com. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, Georgia, 30503, U.S.A. Phone 770-536-0309. Please consult the submission guidelines located at http://www.socionomics.net/PDF/Socionomist_Submission_Guidelines.pdf.
For our latest offerings: Visit our website, www.socionomics.net, listing BOOKS, DVDs and more.
Correspondence is welcome, but volume of mail often precludes a reply. Whether it is a general inquiry, socionomics commentary or a research idea, you can email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Most economists, historians and sociologists
presume that events determine society’s mood. But socionomics hypothesizes
the opposite: that social mood regulates the character of social events. The
events of history—such as investment booms and busts, political events,
macroeconomic trends and even peace and war—are the products of a naturally
occurring pattern of social-mood fluctuation. Such events, therefore, are not
randomly distributed, as is commonly believed, but are in fact probabilistically
predictable. Socionomics also posits that the stock market is the best available
meter of a society’s aggregate mood, that news is irrelevant to social
mood, and that financial and economic decision-making are fundamentally different
in that financial decisions are motivated by the herding impulse while economic
choices are guided by supply and demand. For more information about socionomic
theory, see (1) the text, The
Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior © 1999, by Robert Prechter;
(2) the introductory documentary History's
Hidden Engine; (3) the video Toward
a New Science of Social Prediction, Prechter’s 2004 speech before
the London School of Economics in which he presents evidence to support his
socionomic hypothesis; and (4) the Socionomics Institute’s website, www.socionomics.net.
At no time will the Socionomics Institute make specific recommendations about
a course of action for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller
or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended.
All contents copyright © 2019 Socionomics Institute. All rights reserved. Feel free to quote, cite or review, giving full credit. Typos and other such errors may be corrected after initial posting.