by Mark Galasiewski,
Editor of The Asian-Pacific Financial Forecast
Originally published
in the Dec. 2010 Socionomist
Astute observers can see that the stock market leads the
economy: After stock prices rise for some time, economic conditions
usually improve, and falling stock markets precede economic weakness.
But deeper analysis reveals that the stock market is also a leading
indicator of a whole range of social trends. Our studies show that equities
markets are a kind of barometer of social mood. Inclusionist social
developments, for example, tend to follow periods of rising stock prices
and exclusionist events tend to erupt after prices have declined significantly.
This article illustrates that relationship using contemporary historical
examples from the Middle East.

The chart above shows major social events in the Middle East in conjunction
with the S&P 500, the Tel Aviv 100 and the Amman General stock price
indexes. These stock indexes reflect the social moods in the United
States, Israel and the Arab world, respectively. The Jordanian stock
market is a useful indicator of pan-Arabian mood because it is the oldest
continually traded Arabian market and the others tend to trend with
it. Inclusionist events are displayed above the price lines, and exclusionist
events below them. As you can see, the events noted on the chart generally
express the previously rising or falling trends in social mood for each
society. Socionomics Institute founder Robert Prechter calls this the
socionomic hypothesis.
For example, notice the timing of the start of the Gaza War, which erupted
in late 2008 after declines of more than 50% in both the Israeli and
the Jordanian indexes. Such behavior makes sense from the perspective
of trends in social mood: When mood trends toward the negative, it shows
up immediately in falling stock prices. Then, as fear and anger strain
weak relationships, conflicts eventually erupt. The opposite dynamic
is at work when the social mood is rising or near peaks. For example,
just three years earlier, in the middle of the 2003-2007 rally in the
Tel Aviv 100, Israel’s goodwill toward the Palestinians rose to such
a high level that the government voluntarily decided to dismantle Jewish
settlements in Gaza and to withdraw its forces from the territory.

When mood is positive in one society and negative in another, the results
are also compatible with the socionomic hypothesis. For example, long
periods of rising social mood in both Israeli and Arab societies paved
the way for the Oslo Accords in 1993. In July 2000, one month from the
end of a five-and-a-half-year bull market in the Tel Aviv 100, the leaders
of Israel and Palestine held a similar summit at Camp David in the United
States. But, this time, the Arab index was near the end of a two-year
bear market (the low end of an eight-year trading range), and the two
sides walked away without shaking hands.
Two months later—and four trading days from the end of
the Arab index’s correction—the violent events that would later be labeled
the start of the Second Intifada erupted. One year later, on September
11, 2001, with social mood as reflected by the Amman Index still very
negative, Arab militants executed a mass suicide attack on targets in
the United States.
The chart above uses historical data provided by Global
Financial Data to offer a more detailed view of Israel’s actions in
relation to its Arab neighbors since 1948. As with the earlier chart,
this figure displays inclusionist actions above the price line and exclusionist
actions below it. It shows events that support the socionomic hypothesis
in black and those that do not in gray. The chart displays 13 major
historical events from the period that should be prominent in the minds
of all Israelis. Of the 13 events, 11 appear to agree with the socionomic
hypothesis; only two seem to counter it. One possible explanation for
the exceptions is that in the early 1980s most of the world—in particular
the United States, Israel’s main ally—was nearing the end of the largest
bear market since the Great Depression; therefore its effects may have
influenced Israel’s decisions.
The important point to take from the charts is the relationship
between the price trends and the events. Most people believe that the
nature of social events determines society’s mood—and thus the direction
of stock prices. Our studies lead to the opposite conclusion: that changes
in social mood—as measured by the stock market—determine the nature
of ensuing social events.

The weekly bar chart above shows how strongly mood and
events can align even in the short term. It shows all the violent events
listed on Wikipedia’s “Arab-Israeli Conflict” page since the bear market
in Arabian stocks began in late 2005, charted against our Israeli and
Arab mood meters; all of these events occurred after declines in the
stock market and thus are compatible with the socionomic hypothesis.
The chart also explains many other incidents of violence that originated
in the region, such as the attack by a Jordanian suicide bomber that
killed seven CIA officers in Afghanistan in December 2009 and the increase
in activities by al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) since early
2009, which include:
• the drive-by shooting at a U.S. military recruiting
office in Little Rock, Arkansas in June 2009;
• the suicide bombing attempts on tourists in Yemen and a Saudi royal
in March and August 2009, respectively;
• the attempted 2009 Christmas day bombing of Northwest Airlines flight
253 by a Nigerian man who had plastic explosives sewn into
his underwear;
• suicide bombing and rocket attacks on British targets in Yemen in
April and October 2010; and
• the October 2010 cargo plane bomb plot.
In November, AQAP publically outlined its strategy—called
Operation Hemorrhage—which calls for inexpensive, small-scale attacks
against U.S. interests designed to “bleed the enemy to death” (Inspire
Magazine, an AQAP newsletter; see related article on page 4).
The November 2010 issue of The Asian-Pacific Financial
Forecast called for significant rallies in Arabian stock markets
based on corrective patterns that completed at their 2010 lows (contact
EWI Customer Service for a copy). And, because mood is often most
exclusionist following the end of major corrections, we expect increased
violence in the region soon.
[Ed. Note: Portions of this essay were originally
published in The
Asian-Pacific Financial Forecast in 2008 and 2010.]
|
|
To
protect your privacy, we
will not rent or sell your information. No credit
card is required -- it's all completely free. You
may opt-out of the notifications at any time. |
|